LISTENING
STUDY Question 55:
How do you define sustainable forest management?
LISTENING
STUDY: First, Maureen Smith provides one framing to
show why sustainable forest management is even a question.
[There]
is a fundamental dichotomy in the ways in which the
subjects of forests and timber have come to be viewed.
The modern business of cutting down trees cannot be
unequivocally described as either a renewable agricultural
industry or as an extractive industry (like mining
or oil production) where the original resource is not
considered renewable. As historically and currently
practiced, timber production has characteristics of
both. In essential respects the distinction between
the two is well described by the difference (as the
saying goes) between the forest and the trees. At one
extreme, for example, the large-scale clear-cutting
of old-growth and other late successional forests is
clearly an essentially irreversible extractive process.
No one has proposed that we can deliberately recreate
them in all their complexity once they are gone, and
the time scales of natural regeneration to a mature
forest ecosystem are in any case measured in centuries.
The process of natural regeneration further implies
an absence or subtlety of human presence over such significant
periods of time that its prospects are difficult to
entertain for the future.
At the same time . . .
although plantations have much in common with conventional
agricultural crops, they have very little - except trees
- in common with forests. . . .
The traditional practice
of timber production in the United States, often referred
to as timber mining, has been slowly and unevenly
transitioning to the practice of sustainable timber
production or sustainable yield in recent
decades. . . . More lately these concepts have begun
to give way to new attempts to define sustainable
forest management. . . . - Maureen Smith 1997
LISTENING
STUDY: Some responses, including unified comments from
representatives of the paper industry, reference sustained
yield concepts.
Sustainable
forestry can be defined as meeting the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future generations
to meet their own needs by practicing a land stewardship
ethic that integrates the reforestation, managing, growing,
nurturing and harvesting of trees for useful products
with the conservation of soil, air and water quality,
biological diversity, wildlife and aquatic habitat,
recreation and aesthetics. - American
Forest and Paper Association
Sustainable
forest management can be defined as meeting the needs
of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs by practicing a
land stewardship ethic that integrates the reforestation,
managing, growing, nurturing and harvesting of trees
for useful products with the conservation of soil, air
and water quality, biological diversity, wildlife and
aquatic habitat, recreation and aesthetics. - Stora
Enso
A
sustainable forest is one that meets the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future generations
to meet their own needs. Sustainable forestry is the
practice of a land stewardship ethic that integrates
reforestation, managing, growing, nurturing and harvesting
of trees for useful products with the conservation of
soil, air and water quality, biological diversity, wildlife
and aquatic habitat, recreation and aesthetics. - International
Paper
Sustainable
forest management: forest management that produces goods
for the present without compromising the productive
capability and biological integrity on which future
generations will depend. - Northern Forest Alliance
1999
Principles
of Sustainability:
a) maintenance of soil productivity,
b) conservation of water quality, wetlands, and riparian
zones,
c) maintenance or creation of a healthy balance of forest
age classes,
d) continuous flow of timber, pulpwood, and other forest
products,
e) improvement of the overall quality of the timber
resource as a foundation for more value-added opportunities,
f) addressing scenic quality by limiting adverse aesthetic
impacts of forest harvesting, particularly in high elevation
areas and vistas,
g) conservation and enhancement of habitats that support
a full range of native flora and fauna,
h) protection of unique or fragile natural areas,
i) continuation of opportunities for traditional recreation.
Sustainable forestry: Forest management practices for
which the outcome will be sustained yield. - Northern
Forest Lands Council 1994
LISTENING
STUDY: Other responses highlight ecological integrity
when defining sustainable forest management.
Sustainable forest management can be defined as active
forest stewardship that meets human needs without compromising
the ecological integrity of forest ecosystems. - Michael
Snyder, Forester
To
manage forests in a way that maintains their natural
value. Any extraction of resources and any intrusions
of roads can be harmful. Cautious approaches to determine
the ecological impacts of any intrusion or extraction
should be assessed. - Frank Locantore, Co-op America
Sustainable
forest management: management regimes applied to forestland
that maintain the productive and renewal capacities
as well as the genetic, species and ecological diversity
of forest ecosystems. - United
States Forest Service
In a nutshell, the Silva Forest Foundation defines sustainable
forest management as that which maintains ecological
integrity at all spatial and temporal scales. We have
defined sustainable forest management through our standards
developed for obtaining accredited certifier status
under the Forest Stewardship Council. Documents can
be found on our web site: www.silvafor.org.
- Susan Hammond, Executive Director, Silva Forest
Foundation
Sustainable
forest management means protecting all values of the
forest -- not just timber production, but also water
quality, wildlife habitat, preservation of natural forest
ecosystems and conservation of biodiversity. - Victoria
Mills, Project Manager, Corporate Partnerships, Environmental
Defense
LISTENING
STUDY: Many responses include social, economic, and
ecological components.
Sustainable forest management is the process of managing
a forest to achieve one or more clearly specified objectives
of management with regard to the production of a continuous
flow of desired forest products and services without
undue reduction of its inherent values and future productivity
and without undue undesirable effects on the physical
and social environment. - International
Tropical Timber Organization
Forest resources and forest lands should be sustainably
managed to meet the social, economic, ecological, cultural
and spiritual needs of present and future generations.
These needs are for forest products and services, such
as wood and wood products, water, food, fodder, medicine,
fuel, shelter, employment, recreation, habitats for
wildlife, landscape diversity, carbon sinks and reservoirs,
and for other forest products. Appropriate measures
should be taken to protect forests against harmful effects
of pollution, including air-borne pollution, fires,
pests and diseases, in order to maintain their full
multiple value. - United Nations General Assembly
1992
Sustainable forest management is management that maintains
and enhances the long-term health of forest ecosystems
for the benefit of all living things while providing
environmental, economic, social and cultural opportunities
for present and future generations. - Natural
Resources Canada
Forest
Management deals with the overall administrative, economic,
legal, social, technical and scientific aspects related
to natural and planted forests. It implies various degrees
of deliberate human intervention, ranging from actions
aimed at safeguarding and maintaining the forest ecosystem
and its functions, to favoring specific socially or
economically valuable species or groups of species for
the improved production of goods and services. Sustainable
forest management will ensure that the values derived
from the forest meet present-day needs while at the
same time ensuring their continued availability and
contribution to long-term development needs. - Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1993
National-level criteria of sustainable forest management
focus on the following globally agreed elements: extent
of forest resources; biological diversity; forest health
and vitality; productive functions of forests; protective
functions of forests; socio-economic benefits and needs;
legal, policy and institutional framework. The indicators
vary widely among initiatives owing to differences in
forest types and environmental, social, political and
cultural conditions. - Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations 2000
Sustainable forest management (sustainable forestry):
the stewardship and use of forests and forestlands in
a way, and at a rate, that maintains their biodiversity,
productivity, regeneration capacity, vitality, and potential
to fulfill, now and in the future, relevant ecological,
economic, and social functions at local, national, and
global levels, and that does not cause damage to other
ecosystems. - Ministerial Conference on the Protection
of Forests in Europe 1993
Criteria
for sustainable forestry include:
(a) conservation of biological diversity,
(b) maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems,
(c) maintenance of forest ecosystem health and vitality,
(d) conservation and maintenance of soil and water resources,
(e) maintenance of forest contributions to global carbon
cycles,
(f) maintenance and enhancement of long-term, multiple
socioeconomic benefits to meet the needs of societies,
and
(g) a legal, institutional, and economic framework for
forest conservation and sustainable management. - Montreal
Process 1995
I define "sustainable forestry" as:
a) management, protection,
and restoration that maintains natural forest ecosystems,
remaining wild areas, clean water, abundant and well-distributed
populations of all native species, other biological
components and ecosystem processes of natural forests,
long-term productivity for timber and non-timber forest
products, and other ecosystem services, while
b) allowing for forest
resource extraction and development that is compatible
with (a), and while
c) promoting social equity,
including among present and future generations, and
amongst different economic beneficiaries.
In
the U.S., wood and paper companies, as well as some
non-industrial forest landowners and state trust lands,
need to generate economic returns from their forests.
Even the most "balanced" commercial forest management
is unlikely to fully sustain all forest values, including
wilderness, or species which need extensive intact and
mature forests. However, we can -- and must -- move
towards much greater sustainability on private and other
non-federal forests in the U.S.
Thus
I define "well-managed forests" as forests where resource
protection, restoration, and management is as sustainable
as possible, relative to my definition of "sustainable
forestry," given: a) ecological, social, and economic
contexts for the forest in question, and b) opportunities
for using more sustainable forest management practices.
In the U.S., the social and economic context for forestry
differs most significantly amongst land ownership types.
For example, the public expects National Forests and
other federal public lands to be managed in the public
interest, and along with forest products, to provide
old growth ecosystems, wilderness, and other values
that are less realistic to expect from private ownerships.
- Daniel Hall, Forest Biodiversity Program Director,
American Lands Alliance
Sustainable
forest management maintains native biodiversity and
natural processes of the forest ecosystem, is financially
feasible for the landowner, and is socially acceptable.
- Robert R. Bryan, Forest Ecologist, Maine Audubon
There
is nothing better about old trees than young trees.
Perhaps the ideal state is to have forests of all ages
- young, medium and old - across the landscape. This
will provide the highest diversity of habitats and therefore
an opportunity for the largest number of species to
live in that landscape. - Transcript from Trees
Are the Answer, video hosted by Dr. Patrick Moore,
Green Spirit, 2001
LISTENING
STUDY: Maureen Smith again, suggesting that assuring
sustainability in our forests, especially if we mix
in economic aspects, is not so simple as we might wish.
Although
the value of timber as a commodity can be measured,
forests cannot be similarly deconstructed into simple
economic terms despite the best efforts of diligent
resource economists. Increasingly in recent years, there
have been theoretical attempts to quantify present and
future values of forest biodiversity, the value of (poorly
understood) "ecosystem services" such as climate and
watershed regulation, as well as the amenity (recreational)
and even religious and cultural values of forests. Not
surprisingly, such attempts have failed to do more than
suggest the vast dimensions of our ignorance. . . .
The debates over forests
and timber and over associated public and industry policies
have . . . to be understood to turn largely on whether
one views (or at least portrays) the modern business
of timber production as an extractive industry or as
a renewable industry. One can quickly turn, for example,
from a literature of heartbreaking images and vehement
denunciations of the rape of the forests to mainstream
forest industry publications that cheerfully announce
"we're planting faster than we're cutting." The problem
is that what they have been planting often bears only
a trivial relationship to what they have eliminated.
The jargon of agriculture, with its overtones of cyclical
renewability, is pervasive in discussions of timber
resources. . . . This masks, however, what has substantially
been and continues to be an unrenewable, essentially
extractive process of destruction - at best a simplification
and shallow mimicry of the structural, functional, and
genetic diversity of healthy forest ecosystems. - Maureen
Smith 1997
|